CFD Study on the Influence of Liquid Viscosity on the Swirling Gas-Liquid Flow
Abstract
Swirling two-phase flow is important in industrial mixing and separation systems. In this work, the effect of liquid viscosity was investigated numerically using the Euler-Euler Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model where the liquid and the gas acted as the continuous and dispersed phases, respectively. CFD simulations were performed to model the gas-liquid flow inside a horizontal pipe equipped with a static mixer element with liquid viscosities of 1, 5, 10, and 50 cP. The gas volume fraction contours in the central axial plane show that the evolution of gas distribution is strongly influenced by the liquid viscosity, especially in the region downstream of the element. The calculated results show that the higher the viscosity, the shorter the gas core downstream of the element. Gas separation after the element occurs over a shorter distance with higher liquid viscosity. A possible explanation is that the swirling flow decays faster at higher liquid viscosities, and the buoyancy force dominates over the centrifugal force.
Downloads
References
Q. Liu et al., “Analysis of the static mixer effect on natural gas mixing process in a pipeline,” Flow Meas. Instrum., vol. 85, p. 102146, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2022.102146.
Y. Li et al., “The coupled mixing action of the jet mixer and swirl mixer: An novel static micromixer,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des., vol. 177, pp. 283–290, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cherd.2021.10.040.
W. Gao, Y. Yan, L. Huang, W. Zhang, and K. Shen, “Numerical investigation on combustion characteristics of premixed hydrogen/air in a swirl micro combustor with twisted vanes,” Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, vol. 46, no. 80, pp. 40105–40119, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.193.
M. Hao et al., “Effect of particle self-rotation on separation efficiency in mini-hydrocyclones,” Powder Technol., vol. 399, p. 117165, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2022.117165.
S. Ouyang, Z. Xiong, J. Zhao, and R. Kang, “Separation efficiency theoretical model of swirl-vane separator based on bidirectional vortex,” Ann. Nucl. Energy, vol. 170, p. 108984, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2022.108984.
V. J. Alzamora Guzmán and J. A. Glasscock, “Analytical solution for a strong free-surface water vortex describing flow in a full-scale gravitational vortex hydropower system,” Water Sci. Eng., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 72–79, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.wse.2021.03.004.
R. A. Putra and D. Lucas, “Modeling of the Free-Surface Vortex-Driven Bubble Entrainment into Water,” Water, vol. 12, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.3390/w12030709.
W. Liu, X. Lv, and B. Bai, “The effect of swirl on transition from churn flow to annular flow in an intermediate diameter pipe,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., vol. 109, p. 109861, Dezember 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.109861.
L. Liu and B. Bai, “Experimental study and similarity analysis of separation efficiency of swirl-vane separator,” Nucl. Eng. Des., vol. 359, p. 110442, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110442.
L. Liu, K. Wang, and B. Bai, “Experimental study on flow patterns and transition criteria for vertical swirling gas-liquid flow,” Int. J. Multiph. Flow, vol. 122, p. 103113, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.103113.
L. Liu and B. Bai, “Flow regime identification of swirling gas-liquid flow with image processing technique and neural networks,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 199, pp. 588–601, Mai 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2019.01.037.
W. Liu and B. Bai, “Transition from bubble flow to slug flow along the streamwise direction in a gas–liquid swirling flow,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 202, pp. 392–402, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2019.03.058.
S. Liu, L. Yang, D. Zhang, and J. Xu, “Separation characteristics of the gas and liquid phases in a vane-type swirling flow field,” Int. J. Multiph. Flow, vol. 107, pp. 131–145, Oktober 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.05.025.
Y. Liu, C. Wang, J. Cai, H. Lu, L. Huang, and Q. Yang, “Pilot application of a novel Gas–Liquid separator on offshore platforms,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., vol. 180, pp. 240–245, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.05.001.
R. A. Putra, T. Schäfer, M. Neumann, and D. Lucas, “CFD studies on the gas-liquid flow in the swirl generating device,” Nucl. Eng. Des., vol. 332, pp. 213–225, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.03.034.
R. A. Putra and A. Ramadhona, “CFD study on the flow in various swirl generating devices,” in 2019 5th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST), Jul. 2019, vol. 1, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICST47872.2019.9166322.
R. A. Putra, M. Neumann-Kipping, T. Schäfer, and D. Lucas, “Comparison of Gas–Liquid Flow Characteristics in Geometrically Different Swirl Generating Devices,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 24, 2019, doi: 10.3390/en12244653.
S. Rabha, M. Schubert, F. Grugel, M. Banowski, and U. Hampel, “Visualization and quantitative analysis of dispersive mixing by a helical static mixer in upward co-current gas–liquid flow,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 262, pp. 527–540, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.09.019.
R. A. Putra, “Mixing Characteristics of Gas-Liquid Flow in a Static Mixer: A Numerical Study,” Angkasa J. Ilm. Bid. Teknol., no. Submitted, 2020.
R. A. Putra and A. N. A. Nugroho, “Numerical Simulation of the Gas-Liquid Flow Inside a Horizontal Static Mixer,” J. Inotera, vol. 5, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.31572/inotera.Vol5.Iss2.2020.ID104.
R. A. Putra, A. N. A. Nugroho, A. Ramadhona, and E. W. K. Baroto, “Gas-Liquid Flow in a Vertical Pipe Equipped with a Double Helical Swirl Separator Element,” J. Inotera, vol. 5, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.31572/inotera.Vol5.Iss2.2020.ID110.
ANSYS, “ANSYS CFX-Solver Theory Guide, Release 19.2.” 2019.
M. Ishii and N. Zuber, “Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows,” AIChE J., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 843–855, Sep. 1979, doi: 10.1002/aic.690250513.
A. Tomiyama, H. Tamai, I. Zun, and S. Hosokawa, “Transverse migration of single bubbles in simple shear flows,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 1849–1858, Jun. 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00085-4.
S. P. Antal, R. T. Lahey, and J. E. Flaherty, “Analysis of phase distribution in fully developed laminar bubbly two-phase flow,” Int. J. Multiph. Flow, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 635–652, Sep. 1991, doi: 10.1016/0301-9322(91)90029-3.
A. D. Burns, T. Frank, I. Hamill, and J.-M. Shi, “The Favre Averaged Drag Model for Turbulent Dispersion in Eulerian Multi-Phase Flows,” 5th Int. Conf. Multiph. Flow ICMF-2004 Yokohama Jpn., 2004.
T. R. Auton, J. C. R. Hunt, and M. Prud’Homme, “The force exerted on a body in inviscid unsteady non-uniform rotational flow,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 197, pp. 241–257, 1988, doi: 10.1017/S0022112088003246.
J. Magnaudet, M. Rivero, and J. Fabre, “Accelerated flows past a rigid sphere or a spherical bubble. Part 1. Steady straining flow,” J. Fluid Mech., vol. 284, pp. 97–135, 1995, doi: 10.1017/S0022112095000280.
M. R. Maxey and J. J. Riley, “Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a nonuniform flow,” Phys. Fluids, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 883–889, Apr. 1983, doi: 10.1063/1.864230.
F. R. Menter, “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications,” AIAA J., vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1598–1605, Aug. 1994, doi: 10.2514/3.12149.
Y. Sato and K. Sekoguchi, “Liquid velocity distribution in two-phase bubble flow,” Int. J. Multiph. Flow, vol. 2, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jun. 1975, doi: 10.1016/0301-9322(75)90030-0.
