Optimization of Geopolymer Compressive Strength Using Response Surface Methodology

  • Cut Rahmawati Universitas Abulyatama
Keywords: nanosilica, cellulose nanocrystals, compressive strength, Central Composite Design, optimation


Geopolymers have issues related to cracking resistance and pore filling, decreasing their mechanical strength. However, the addition of nanosilica and Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNCs) has been found to enhance their mechanical properties. This study focused on optimizing the utilization of nanosilica and CNCs to enhance the compressive strength of geopolymers. This research employed Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with Central Composite Design (CCD). The concentrations of nanosilica and CNCs used in the experiments ranged from 2% to 4% and 1% to 3%, respectively. The experimental results consist of 13 runs, including 5 center point runs. The model suggested concentrations of nanosilica and CNCs of 3.98% and 1%, respectively, for an optimal compressive strength of 22.20 MPa. The proposed quadratic model exhibited high accuracy, as evidenced by an R2 of 0.9865, Adj- R2 of 0.9769, and predicted R2 of 0.9168. The closeness of R2 to 1 indicates a strong correlation between the actual and predicted values, thus highlighting the model's significant relevance. Ultimately, the model developed in this study holds the potential for predicting the compressive strength of geopolymers incorporating nanosilica and CNCs.


Download data is not yet available.


C. Rahmawati, S. Aprilia, T. Saidi, T. B. Aulia, and I. Ahmad, “Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from typha sp. as a reinforcing agent,” Journal of natural fibers, vol. 18, pp. 1–14, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.1904486.

L. P. Singh, S. K. Bhattacharyya, and S. Ahalawat, “Preparation of size controlled silica nano particles and its functional role in cementitious system,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 345–352, 2012, doi: 10.3151/jact.10.345.

M. Jalal, E. Mansouri, M. Sharifipour, and A. R. Pouladkhan, “Mechanical, rheological, durability and microstructural properties of high performance self-compacting concrete containing SiO2 micro and nanoparticles,” Materials and Design, vol. 34, pp. 389–400, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.08.037.

C. Rahmawati, S. Aprilia, T. Saidi, and T. B. Aulia, “Current development of geopolymer cement with nanosilica and cellulose nanocrystals,” in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, pp. 1–8, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1783/1/012056.

C. Rahmawati et al., “Mechanical Properties and Fracture Parameters of Geopolymers based on Cellulose Nanocrystals from Typha sp. Fibers,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, p. e01498, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01498.

J. Ahmad, A. Majdi, A. F. Deifalla, H. F. Isleem, and C. Rahmawati, “Concrete Made with Partially Substitutions of Copper Slag (CPS): State of the Art Review,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 15, pp. 1–28, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155196.

L. Handayani, S. Aprilia, C. Rahmawati, T. B. Aulia, and P. Ludviq, “Sodium Silicate from Rice Husk Ash and Their Effects as Geopolymer Cement,” Polymers, vol. 14, no. 14, p. 2920, 2022.

C. Rahmawati, S. Aprilia, T. Saidi, T. B. Aulia, and A. E. Hadi, “The Effects of Nanosilica on Mechanical Properties and Fracture Toughness of Geopolymer Cement,” Polymers, vol. 13, no. 13, p. 2178, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13132178.

A. R. Alvee et al., “Experimental study of the mechanical properties and microstructure of geopolymer paste containing nano-silica from agricultural waste and crystalline admixtures,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 16, p. e00792, 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.CSCM.2021.E00792.

M. Ali, A. Kumar, A. Yvaz, and B. Salah, “Central composite design application in the optimization of the effect of pumice stone on lightweight concrete properties using RSM,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 18, p. e01958, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e01958.

M. Zahid, N. Shafiq, M. H. Isa, and L. Gil, “Statistical modeling and mix design optimization of fly ash based engineered geopolymer composite using response surface methodology,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 194, pp. 483–498, 2018.

M. Ali et al., “Central composite design application in the optimization of the effect of waste foundry sand on concrete properties using RSM,” Structures, vol. 46, pp. 1581–1594, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.11.013.

M. Al Salaheen et al., “Modelling and Optimization for Mortar Compressive Strength Incorporating Heat-Treated Fly Oil Shale Ash as an Effective Supplementary Cementitious Material Using Response Surface Methodology,” Materials, vol. 15, no. 19, p. 6538, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196538.

K. A. Buyondo, P. W. Olupot, J. B. Kirabira, and A. A. Yusuf, “Optimization of production parameters for rice husk ash-based geopolymer cement using response surface methodology,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 13, p. e00461, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00461.

D. J. S. Chong, Y. J. Chan, S. K. Arumugasamy, S. K. Yazdi, and J. W. Lim, “Optimisation and performance evaluation of response surface methodology (RSM), artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) in the prediction of biogas production from palm oil mill effluent (POME),” Energy, vol. 266, p. 126449, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126449.

S. Chamoli, “ANN and RSM approach for modeling and optimization of designing parameters for a V down perforated baffle roughened rectangular channel,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 429–446, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2015.03.018.

T. Alomayri, “Experimental study of the microstructural and mechanical properties of geopolymer paste with nano material (Al2O3),” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 25, no. August 2018, p. 100788, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100788.

T. Phoo-ngernkham, P. Chindaprasirt, V. Sata, S. Hanjitsuwan, and S. Hatanaka, “The effect of adding nano-SiO2 and nano-Al2O3 on properties of high calcium fly ash geopolymer cured at ambient temperature,” Materials and Design, vol. 55, pp. 58–65, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.049.

T. Phoo-ngernkham, P. Chindaprasirt, V. Sata, S. Pangdaeng, and T. Sinsiri, “Properties of high calcium fly ash geopolymer pastes with Portland cement as an additive,” International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, vol. 20, pp. 214–220, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-013-0715-6.

P. Chindaprasirt, P. De Silva, K. Sagoe-Crentsil, and S. Hanjitsuwan, “Effect of SiO2 and Al2O3 on the setting and hardening of high calcium fly ash-based geopolymer systems,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 47, pp. 4876–4883, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6353-y.

K. Kanny and T. P. Mohan, “Resin infusion analysis of nanoclay filled glass fiber laminates,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 58, pp. 328–334, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.025.

A. Hakamy, F. U. A. Shaikh, and I. M. Low, “Characteristics of nanoclay and calcined nanoclay-cement nanocomposites,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 78, pp. 174–184, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.03.074.

Y. Cao, P. Zavattieri, J. Youngblood, R. Moon, and J. Weiss, “The relationship between cellulose nanocrystal dispersion and strength,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 119, pp. 71–79, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.077.

M. S. Konsta-Gdoutos, Z. S. Metaxa, and S. P. Shah, “Multi-scale mechanical and fracture characteristics and early-age strain capacity of high performance carbon nanotube/cement nanocomposites,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 110–115, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.10.007.

Konsta-Gdoutos, M. S., Z. S. Metaxa, and S. P. Shah, “Highly dispersed carbon nanotube reinforced cement based materials,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1052–1059, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.02.015.

S. Y. Iftikhar, F. M. Iqbal, W. Hassan, B. Nasir, and A. R. Sarwar, “Desirability combined response surface methodology approach for optimization of prednisolone acetate loaded chitosan nanoparticles and in-vitro assessment,” in Materials Research Express, 2020, pp. 1–15, doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/abc772.

A. Waqar et al., “Effect of Coir Fibre Ash (CFA) on the strengths, modulus of elasticity and embodied carbon of concrete using response surface methodology (RSM) and optimization,” Results in Engineering, vol. 17, p. 100883, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100883.

I. Rahmawati, B. A. Fachri, Y. H. Manurung, N. Nurtsulutsiyah, and M. Reza, “Application of response surface methodology in optimization condition of anthocyanin extraction process of cocoa peel waste with Microwave Assisted Extraction Method (MAE),” in Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, pp. 1–13, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/743/1/012091.

How to Cite
C. Rahmawati, “Optimization of Geopolymer Compressive Strength Using Response Surface Methodology”, JI, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 203-212, Jul. 2023.

Most read articles by the same author(s)