Comparison of Photon Dose Distribution in Breast Cancer Using 3DCRT and Half Beam Techniques

  • Nurrohimawati Yusrani Universitas Mulawarman
  • Robert Janssen Stevenly Abdoel Wahab Sjahranie Hospital Samarinda
  • Rahmawati Munir Physics Study Program, Mulawarman University, Samarinda
  • Erlinda Ratnasari Putri Physics Study Program, Mulawarman University, Samarinda
Keywords: 3DCRT, Dose Distribution, Half Beam, Breast Cancer

Abstract

Radiotherapy planning can be done with 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3DCRT) and Half Beam. The success of radiotherapy planning is considered by comparing the isodose curve, Dose Volume Histogram (DVH), Organs At Risk (OAR), Homogeneity Index (HI), and Conformity Index (CI) obtained by the 3DCRT and Half Beam techniques. This study used data from 5 patients at the Radiotherapy Installation at A.W. Hospital. Sjahranie Samarinda with radiation planning of 5000 cGy (25×2 Gy) for breast cancer. The two radiation plans used gantry angles of 310˚ and 120˚. The calculated dose distribution value can be seen through the 90%, 95% PTV dose, and OAR absorbed dose. PTV doses of 90% and 95% in the 3DCRT technique covered the target well. The radiation dose values of the 3DCRT technique at PTV 90% were around 4860 cGy – 4930 cGy and PTV 95% were around 4750 cGy – 4840 cGy. Meanwhile, the Half Beam technique could not cover the target well. It was because the radiation dose values received by the Half Beam
technique at 90% PTV were around 780 cGy – 4860 cGy and 95%
PTV were around 2210 cGy – 5020 cGy. The OAR absorbed doses values for the 3DCRT and Half Beam techniques were still within the safe limits of tolerance according to QUANTEC. Meanwhile, the HI and CI values in the 3DCRT technique were closer to the rules of ICRU Report 83 of 2010 compared to the Half Beam technique. Therefore, from the values that have been obtained, the success rate of the radiotherapy planning process after measurements is shown in the 3DCRT technique. It has the value of more efficient dose calculations and can be used as a reference in optimizing dose distribution to patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. A. Toyib, A. Haryadi, E. P. Adi, and Wihantoro, “Simulasi dosis serap kanker payudara dengan empat sudut penyinaran menggunakan teknik radioterapi konformal tiga dimensi,” Jurnal Teras Fisika, vol.5, no. 2, pp. 9-16, 2022, doi: 10.20884/1.jtf.2022.5.2.6233.

E. B. Podgorsak, Radiation Oncology Physics : A Handbook for Teachers and Students, IAEA. Vienna, 2005.

R. Susworo and Kodrat, Dasar-dasar Radioterapi Tata Laksana Radioterapi Penyakit Kanker (Edisi II). Jakarta: UI Press, 2017.

E. Angelina, W. E. Wibowo, R. D. Pertiwi, and S. Ardjo, “Karakteristik berkas foton lapangan kecil setengah lapangan ( half beam ) dengan menggunakan wedge,” Jurnal of Medical Physics and Biophysics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 190–196, 2018.

W. Farhiyati, R. Subroto, I. W. A. Makmur, N. Qomariyah, and R. Wirawan, “Treatment Planning System (Tps) Kanker Payudara Menggunakan Teknik 3DCRT,” ORBITA, Jurnal

Hasil Kajian, Inovasi, dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 150–154, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v6i1.2115.

Y. Asri, G. N. Sutapa, I. W. B. Sudarsana, and R. Irhas, “Perbandingan Radiasi Kanker Serviks Pada Organ Bladder Dengan Radioterapi LINAC Energi 10 MV Menggunakan Teknik 3DCRT dan IMRT Di RSUP Sanglah Denpasar," Buletin Fisika, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 98–105, 2023.

P. Mayles, Handbook of Radiotherapy Physics : Teori and Practice. New York: Taylor and Francis Group, 2007.

I. J. E. Satiti, “Komparasi Treatment Planning Berkas Foton Teknik 3 Dimensional –Conformal Radiation Therapy Dan Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Untuk Kanker Payudara Kiri,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Inovasi Dan Pendayagunaan Teknologi Nuklir,

pp. 143–150, 2020.

Y. D. Savitri, G. N. Sutapa, I. W. B. Sudarsana, and R. Irhas, “Radioterapi Linac Energi 6 MV Terhadap Kanker Serviks Pada Organ Rektum Menggunakan Teknik 3DCRT dan IMRT Di RSUP Sanglah Denpasar,” Kappa Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 7–14, 2022, doi:

https://doi.org/10.29408/kpj.v6i1.4947.

Y. E. Daniartie, P. S. Wardani, D. R. P. S. Putri, R. J. Stevenly, and Suryaningsih, “Analisis Treatment Planning System dengan Menggunakan Teknik Box dan Teknik Antero Posterior-Postero Anterior pada Kasus Kanker Serviks,” Progressive Physics Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 118–124, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.30872/ppj.v3i1.873.

A. Maftuhatun, A. Haryadi, A. Widikusumo, and Kurniasari, “Pola Kurva Isodosis Dari Penyinaran Berkas Profil Datar pada Kanker Payudara Dengan Teknik Tangensial Menggunakan MCNPX," Jurnal Teras Fisika, vol. 2, no, pp. 19–23, 2019, doi: 10.20884/1.jtf.2019.2.2.2156.

ICRU Report 83, “Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon-Beam Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT),” Journal of the ICRU, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–106, 2010, doi: 10.1093/jicru/ndq001.

Published
2024-09-02
How to Cite
[1]
N. Yusrani, Robert Janssen Stevenly, Rahmawati Munir, and Erlinda Ratnasari Putri, “Comparison of Photon Dose Distribution in Breast Cancer Using 3DCRT and Half Beam Techniques”, JI, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 410-419, Sep. 2024.