Normalization-Simple Additive Weighting to Determination of a Single Tuition

  • Winda Aprianti Politeknik Negeri Tanah Laut
  • Herfia Rhomadhona Politeknik Negeri Tanah Laut
  • Jaka Permadi Politeknik Negeri Tanah Laut
  • Yuniska Fithriyyah Politeknik Negeri Tanah Laut
Keywords: Simple Additive Weighting, Normalization, Single Tuition

Abstract

Determination of a single tuition appropriately is important to ensure that every student gets a fair single tuition in accordance with their economic conditions. The single tuition team to determine a single tuition sometimes they have differences of opinion in determining a single tuition so that it requires a relatively long time. This problem can be solved by applying Simple Additive Weighting to student data. The collected data is formed into Data1 and Data 2. There is a value of 0 for the cost attribute so that it requires normalization which can solve the problem. The results of the application of Simple Additive Weighting facilitate the determination of a single tuition because by entering student data a preference value is generated as a reference for determining a single tuition. Application in Data 1 produces several similarities in preference values but is in different groups, but the application of Data 2 always results in different preference values. This difference shows that the application of Simple Additive Weighting to Data 2 is better than the application of Data 1.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 39 Tahun 2016. Indonesia: Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi, 2016.

B. I. Libing, D. M. Sihotang, and M. Boru, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Uang Kuliah Tunggal Kepada Mahasiswa Baru Di Universitas Nusa Cendana Menggunakan Metode Technique For Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution (TOPSIS),” J-ICON, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2019.

Mia Purnama, S. H. Sitorus, and M. Diponegoro, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Kelompok Uang Kuliah Tunggal Menggunakan Metode Topsis Dengan Pembobotan Metode Ranking (Studi Kasus: Fakultas MIPA Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak),” Coding J. Komput. dan Apl., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 11–18, 2019.

H. Novianti, M. Mulya, and I. Jambak, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Uang Kuliah Tunggal Dengan Metode Analitical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Di Universitas Sriwijaya,” JSI J. Sist. Inf., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1711–1721, 2019.

A. Baskoro and M. Kamisutara, “Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan UKT/SPP Mahasiswa dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) pada Perguruan Tinggi,” Explor. J. Keilmuan dan Apl. Tek. Inform., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 17–25, 2021.

S. Purnawanti, “Pengambilan keputusan golongan UKT di UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya dengan menggunakan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” 2021.

I. Tahir, “Model Pengambilan Keputusan Penentuan Uang Kuliah Tunggal (UKT) Pada Perguruan Tinggi Negeri (Studi Kasus: Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka),” J. Speed – Sentra Penelit. Eng. dan Edukasi, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2016.

G. Testiana and Rachmansyah, “Pemanfaatan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW)untuk Penentuan Penerima UKT Kelompok,” in Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi, Komunikasi dan Industri (SNTIKI) 9, 2017, pp. 1–7.

A. Afshari, M. Mojahed, and R. M. Yusuff, “Simple Additive Weighting approach to Personnel Selection problem,” Int. J. Innov. Manag. Technol., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 511–515, 2010.

A. Munawaroh, S. Sunardiyo, and Isdiyarto, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) pada Perancangan Decision Support System untuk Penilaian Kinerja Guru (PKG),” Edu Komputika J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2017.

N. C. Resti, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Lokasi untuk Cabang Baru Toko Pakan UD. Indo Multi Fish,” Intensif, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 102, 2017.

V. Julianto, Lastriani, W. Aprianti, and Herpendi, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) untuk Penentuan Seleksi Staf Terbaik Politeknik Negeri Tanah Laut Berbasis Web Mobile,” J. Sains dan Inform., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 120–129, 2018.

S. H. Sahir, R. Rosmawati2, and K. Minan, “Simple Additive Weighting Method to Determining Employee Salary Increase Rate,” nternational J. Sci. Res. Sci. Technol., vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 42–48, 2017.

A. Jahan, K. Edwards, and M. Bahraminasab, Multi-criteria Decision Analysis for Supporting the Selection of Engineering Materials in Product Design, 2nd Editio. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2016.

Nazanin Vafaei, R. A. Ribeiro, and L. M. Camarinha-Matos, “Selection of Normalization Technique for Weighted Average Multi-Criteria Decision Making,” Technol. Innov. Resilient Syst., vol. 521, pp. 43–52, 2018.

D. Nofriansyah, Konsep Data Mining vs Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2015.

Published
2022-05-18
How to Cite
[1]
Winda Aprianti, Herfia Rhomadhona, Jaka Permadi, and Yuniska Fithriyyah, “Normalization-Simple Additive Weighting to Determination of a Single Tuition”, JI, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 42-52, May 2022.

Most read articles by the same author(s)